Simple man seeks simple Twitter

I’ve been married for 16 years, but I remember what it was like being single, so I enjoyed this post about dating from The High-Heeled Papergirl.

So I hit the little heart button underneath. Because I’m a simple man, I just thought I’d be expressing to the writer my appreciation for her efforts (I also commented on it.)

But no …

“These digital showrooms allow people to present the best version of themselves for everyone else to see. Often, people use the number of likes to judge others and themselves. That little heart-shaped button becomes a publicly quantifiable measure of social support.

According to this research, the “like” button works as a “mechanism to compare oneself with others.” The number of “likes,” make social support quantifiable. It can then be easily viewed for making social comparisons.” — A. Trevor Sutton, “Why Twitter’s cute, heart-shaped ‘like’ button is not so harmless,” The Conversation

I would hope anyone whose stuff I “like” does see it as a measure of support … because that’s exactly what I’m doing.

Under the right circumstances, I also hope it leads to a sort of bond, as the article also points out (although not a dating one), in that we find what the other has to say enjoyable and worthy of continued reading.

And I’m definitely pleased with myself if something I write gets a lot of “likes.” Of course, for me, that’s maybe 10, so if I make comparisons to others based on how many I get, I’m in trouble.

Sometimes a “like” is just a “like.”

But then again, because I’m a simple man, when I retweet, it actually is an endorsement. None of this “I disagree with what this writer is saying, but I’m going to share it with all of you because I find it worthy of your attention and discussion.”

I don’t hate-read, hate-listen or hate-watch, so why would I subject others to that?

Well, maybe I hate-read once in a while …

And because I’m a simple man, if I make an error in the writing of a Twitter post, I would like to have some way of correcting it without deleting it and starting over … an “edit” function, if you will …

But apparently that’s another nice thing we just can’t have.

“We got a partial explanation last fall from Kevin Weil, then the company’s head of product, who said at a Recode conference in October that nothing was imminent. “There are real challenges to editing tweets after you post them,” he said. For instance, an edit that changes the meaning of a tweet could present problems for those who had rebroadcast it, because their commentary around it might no longer make sense. In the worst case, a user could theoretically tweet something benign, get it circulated widely, then change it to something offensive or graphic.” — Will Oreums, “Why Twitter Won’t Give Us an Edit Button,” Slate

Seriously, all I want to do is fix typos, and I can’t because there are people who might go back and change the Tweet I liked or retweeted — since, after all, I’m using it to show my appreciation and/or endorse it — to pro-Nazi propaganda or something like that?

Who are these people?

Seriously, who the duck are these ducking people?

5 thoughts on “Simple man seeks simple Twitter

  1. I didn’t mean to come off as rude or anything by leaving your tweet unanswered. I don’t use Twitter to connect with people as much as I used to. I’m glad you enjoyed reading my post and I’m also very happy you reached out to me to give me your feedback. Apologies for not taking the time to reply.


  2. Interesting post, as always. When I think about Twitter and not being able to edit, I go back and forth. I would love to correct my typos. But then I think about our president, and how he loves to tweet things that are absolutely contrary to his previous statements. His backdated tweets act as proof, in addition to comedic relief. I shudder to think of him editing his tweets, or anyone else who makes headlines over their ignorant 280-character platform.


    1. Ahhh … yes. There’s a reason why people like to say “There’s always a tweet …” when it comes to him.

      But you bring up another thing that makes it complicated in ways 98 percent of us would never care about. We just want to turn “it’s” into “its” when we get it wrong by mistake, or autocorrect puts it in.

      And thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s